Line-by-line code review
We examine risky flows such as authentication, authorisation, input validation and data access with both tooling and manual review. Each finding is recorded with its file, line and impact.
We review your source code, dependencies and repository history within the authorised scope. Every finding is reported with file, line, impact and a suggested fix; if you wish, we plan the fix together.
We examine risky flows such as authentication, authorisation, input validation and data access with both tooling and manual review. Each finding is recorded with its file, line and impact.
We scan the packages you use for known vulnerabilities, abandoned versions and licence risks, and suggest an upgrade order based on the risk of breaking changes.
We find API keys, passwords and tokens left in the repository and in old commits, and provide a step-by-step plan to rotate the key and clean the history.
A finding is closed in four steps that fit your development flow, and it is verified without skipping any of them.
We clarify the scope, deliverables and acceptance criteria together in the first meeting. The written quote lists that scope item by item; if the scope changes, the quote is updated as a new version.
Each step ends with something concrete in your hands; we move on with your approval.
Together we put the goal, the boundaries and the acceptance criteria in writing.
We assess the current state against agreed criteria and note gaps with evidence.
We share what was done, the result and the next step in a plain report.
We retest fixed findings and confirm with evidence that they are closed.
Which categories are applied is agreed together, based on your target and scope.
We examine the code without running the application and find, line by line, the mistakes that lead to vulnerabilities.
We identify versions with known vulnerabilities among the ready-made libraries your code uses.
We catch insecure settings in the code files that build your servers and cloud resources, before those resources are even created.
We scan your code repository, including its history, for passwords, API keys and access details written into it by mistake.
The figures are the number of checks in our automated security engines. Not every category runs in every test; the ones that fit your target and scope are selected.
Every test runs with your written permission and within the scope we agree together. Tests that could disrupt a service, and social engineering, are planned only with separate written approval. No test proves that a system is completely secure; we report clearly what was and was not found.
What is included, what we need from you, timing and payment, all in one place. The exact scope and price are set in the written quote.
Tell us what you need; we will define the scope together.
Tell us about your projectWe work only with the read-only access you grant, within the agreed repositories and branches. Access is time-limited and removed when the work ends; how the code is handled is set out in the contract.
Yes. Only systems you are authorised for and have approved in writing are assessed.
Scope, time window and methods are agreed in advance; risky steps require your separate approval.
Tell us what you need; we will define the scope together.