google's new serp has an ai-generated summary (ai overview) — i want my site to appear in that section. how do i do it?
is it different from normal ranking, or do the same pages show up? if it's the same pages, it means sites with high rankings will already appear in ai overview.
google ai overviews: google quotes from the first 5-10 ranked sites and creates a summary. so ai overview = ranking is very important. if you get into the top 5 = high chance of appearing in ai overview.
difference: normal ranking goes directly to the site link (click). ai overview quotes from the site (indirect traffic). so part of the traffic comes from ai overview, direct links might be fewer.
strategy: 1) get into top 5-10 ranking (normal seo). 2) make the summary attractive (first 100 words matter). 3) add faq schema (google ai picks more accurate info).
ai overview source priority: 1) high authority site. 2) fresh content (recently updated). 3) structured data (faq, schema). 4) user rating. so: authority + fresh + schema = high chance of appearing in ai overview.
one of our posts made it to top 3 and it also appeared in ai overview. looking at traffic, 10% of it was coming from ai overview links (indirect). writing the summary correctly and adding schema was important.
to appear in ai overview first be in top 5-10 in ranking, then improve content quality. add schema make faqs write an attractive summary.
I feel the same way. Ranking is the result, search intent is the input. Look at intent first.
Just leaving this note, it might be useful.
i'm a small business, let me explain from my side. everyone rushing into appearing in ai searches gets stuck at the same point.
crrect me if Im wrong.
If I understood correctly you're saying: The harder it is to reverse a decision the slower you should make it.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
There's a trap here, let me mention it. Any unwritten clause becomes a point of disagreement later, as both sides remember it differently.
Speed is a threshold issue; if you're already fast, making it faster changes nothing. Just leaving this note, it might be useful.
Let me share what happened to me; it might be useful. Most time waste accumulates in tasks waiting for approval.
Just leaving this note it might be useful.
My perspective changed after experiencing that. The real issue isn't the number, but what it's based on.
Following. I mean most time waste accumulates in tasks waiting for approval.
Any unwritten clause becomes a point of disagreement later as both sides remember it differently.
Thanks for writing this, that's the right way. A competitor's ranking might come from years of accumulation, not just their content.
Good luck with that.
generally correct, but one part is missing and start with a small trial; dont commit to everything at once.
of course, it varies if your situation is different.
we experienced almost the exact same thing last year then any unwritten clause becomes a point of disagreement later, as both sieds remember it differently.
if you don't write this down from the start, it leads to arguments later then that's all, sorry if I went on too long.
My perspective changed after experiencing that. A page that answers one question works better than one touching on five topics.
Just leaving this note, it might be useful.