my code is on GitHub. Agency says: we'll manage it, download if needed. It's my code, don't I have the right to ask for access?
They uploaded to GitHub but won't give me access — are they right?
Source code belongs to the client. Full access must be granted. If the agency wants to manage it they should provide admin rights. Put it in the contract.
I have an objection here. If you don't write this down from the start, it leads to arguments later.
Processes without records never improve, because you don't know what to fix.
My perspective changed after experiencing that. Just because everyone does it doesn't mean it's right.
Hasty decisions become decisions you have to fix six months later.
Let me share my experience. The answer varies greatly by industry; there is no one-size-fits-all rule.
Of course, it varies if your situation is different.
I'm in the same situation, that's why I'm asking. Code without setup documentation isn't yours, even if you have it.
That's all, sorry if I went on too long.
Yes, that's exactly how it is with source code repository access. If you don't write this down from the start, it leads to arguments later.
Taking notes for two weeks yields better results than a six-month estimate. If you post the result here, it will help others too.
- Job title
- Accounting clerk
- Sector
- Accounting & advisory
- Organization type
- 8-person team
- Joined
- Jan 2025
- Message
- 347
Could you elaborate on that? If you get three different answers on a topic the question was asked wrong.
The cheap-looking path usually ends up costing more later. Don't hesitate to ask; those who don't ask always pay more.
This is my opinion, I'm not claiming it's absolute truth.
- Job title
- Technical service technician
- Sector
- Retail
- Organization type
- workshop
- Joined
- Oct 2022
- Message
- 142
Exactly like that. Every "we'll look at it later" in a meeting means unbilled work.
In legacy systems, the most expensive thing is unknown dependencies. If you have questions, write them; I'll answer as best I can.
we need to make a distinction here. if scope grows, either time or budget must grow. tbh there is no tihrd option.
if you have questions, write them; I'll answer as best I can.
- Job title
- Board member
- Sector
- Advertising and promotion
- Organization type
- 20-person company
- Joined
- Jun 2024
- Message
- 155
- Job title
- QA Tester
- Sector
- Printing
- Organization type
- sole proprietorship
- Joined
- Jan 2025
- Message
- 178
I'm in the same situation, that's why I'm asking. In legacy systems, the most expensive thing is unknown dependencies.
Just because everyone does it doesn't mean it's right. Correct me if I'm wrong.
- Job title
- Social media manager
- Sector
- Real estate
- Organization type
- 8-person team
- Joined
- Aug 2023
- Message
- 65
I have no experience with source code repository access, so I'm asking. Don't hesitate to ask; those who don't ask always pay more.
Good luck with that.
I have no experience with source code repository access, so I'm asking. In legacy systems, the most expensive thing is unknown dependencies.
Hope this helps.
- Job title
- Store associate
- Sector
- Construction
- Organization type
- a company within a holding
- Joined
- Jul 2022
- Message
- 153
Generally correct, but one part is missing. When making a decision, first look at what data you have on hand.
If you post the result here, it will help others too.
- Job title
- Project manager
- Sector
- E-commerce
- Organization type
- cooperative
- Joined
- May 2024
- Message
- 97
to get into the details: If you get three different answers on a topic the question was asked wrong.
- Job title
- Country Manager
- Sector
- E-commerce
- Organization type
- boutique agency
- Joined
- May 2023
- Message
- 115
Exactly, and not many people know this. When making decisions, write down the worst-case scenario too, not just the best.
Good luck with that.
This approach has a cost which isnt discussed... honestly most time waste accumulates in tasks waiting for approval.
In legacy systems the most expensive thing is unknown dependencies. honestly proven by experience.