forumNew topic

We got a 40-page penetration testing report — any sample reports to compare it against?

ÜÜmit B***Expert
Job title
System support specialist
Sector
Cosmetics
Organization type
medium-sized business
Joined
Apr 2025
Message
15
#1

We are a London-based B2B cross-border e-commerce and logistics software company with 25 employees. To sign a deal with a new enterprise client, we were required to have an independent penetration test conducted. We hired a security firm on the market and paid 3,500 GBP for the test. Following the assessment we received a 40-page PDF report.

The problem is that 25 pages of the report are just raw screenshots from an automated scanning tool and generic definitions about TLS certificates. We couldn't find a concise summary we could present to our board or the client. Since this is the first time we've ever received a penetration test report, we can't tell whether this document is truly high-quality and up to industry standards.

Where can we find good, sanitized or older sample penetration testing reports? What sections are absolutely essential in a professional report, and what are the dead giveaways of a poor one?

YYiğit N***Member
Job title
Product Manager
Sector
E-commerce
Organization type
300-person organization
Joined
Sep 2024
Message
115
Most Helpful#2

Short answer: What you have is most likely not a true penetration test, but the raw output of an automated vulnerability scan. At least half of a quality penetration testing report should consist of manual findings explaining how the identified vulnerabilities were verified by a human expert, how the system could be breached, and what the business risk entails.

When evaluating a good penetration testing report, you should look for these four core sections: 1) Executive Summary: A 1-2 page section written in language a non-technical management team and your client can understand, summarizing the overall security posture and business risk. 2) Scope and Methodology: A clear framework outlining which IPs, domains, and API endpoints were tested, along with the benchmarked standards. 3) Verified Finding Details: Step-by-step screenshots or request-response logs showing the exact steps an attacker would take to exploit each vulnerability. 4) Actionable Remediation Guidance: Clear, code- or configuration-level recommendations explaining how your developers can patch the issue.

The dead giveaways of a weak report are: unvetted false positives generated by automated scanners, pages dedicated to treating low-level issues like TLS version warnings or cookie flags as critical vulnerabilities, and generic text copy-pasted across every finding. You can review numerous sanitized, free sample report templates on the websites of international cybersecurity organizations.

YYiğit A***VeteranCommunity member
Joined
Jan 2025
Message
2
#3

If there's no proof of exploit in the report, that test simply didn't happen. For example, if they claim to have found a SQL Injection, they have to show step-by-step how they extracted benign data from the database. They can't just drop the tool's vulnerability detected alert and call it a day.

DDamla Y***ExpertCommunity member
Joined
Feb 2025
Message
57
#4

We fell victim to a similar report two years ago for 2,500 GBP. Our client's security auditor rejected it on sight, stating it was merely a vulnerability scan, not a penetration test. We ended up having to redo the engagement with another specialist.

ZZerrin G***MemberCommunity member
Joined
Jul 2023
Message
260
#5

3,500 GBP is pretty much on the lower limit for a comprehensive manual test in the UK market. At that price, they usually just run a tool and spit out a report. A genuine test requires at least 3-5 man-days of manual effort, and the invoice reflects that.

AAslıMember
Job title
Product photographer
Organization type
early-stage startup
Joined
Jul 2024
Message
76
#6

Send the report back to the firm and ask for two things: first, a one-page risk and impact summary for management; second, actionable steps so your dev team can verify the fixes. If your contract includes a manual testing clause, they are obligated to rectify this.

KKemal S***Member
Job title
Field sales representative
Sector
Machinery manufacturing
Organization type
two-branch business
Joined
Jun 2023
Message
62
#7

What exact term is used for the service in your contract? Vulnerability scan or penetration test? Unfortunately, these two services get mixed up a lot in the industry, and if the contract says vulnerability scan, it'll be tough to dispute.

FFiliz Ö***Member
Job title
Operations manager
Sector
Seafood
Organization type
8-person team
Joined
Sep 2024
Message
383
#8

don't be fooled by page count at all. i mean a clean, hand-crafted 15-page report that hits the bullseye is ten times more valuable than an 80-page automated scanner dump.

İİbrahim Y***Expert
Job title
Project manager
Sector
Paper
Organization type
boutique agency
Joined
Jan 2023
Message
120
#9

It would be in your best interest to request a revision from your security provider before handing this report directly to your enterprise client. An experienced enterprise auditor will instantly recognize the automated scan output, which will damage your credibility.

Correction: I misremembered the figure, it was a bit lower.

İİlker K***VeteranCommunity member
Joined
Nov 2023
Message
343
#10

Check these three things to audit the report you have: 1) Are false positives filtered out, or did they dump every single warning into the report? 2) Are risk scores tailored to your business context? 3) Can your developer actually understand how to fix the code when reading it?

MMetin G***MemberCommunity member
Joined
Sep 2024
Message
219
#11

Timely topic.

JJale E***Veteran
Job title
Sales Manager
Sector
Furniture manufacturing
Organization type
cooperative
Joined
Nov 2024
Message
292
#12

You're right.

ÜÜlkü Y***MemberCommunity member
Joined
Oct 2025
Message
94
#13

it's rare to find an explantion this clear.

İİlker A***MemberCommunity member
Joined
Feb 2023
Message
292
#14

I'm a small business, let me explain from my side. The answer varies greatly by industry; there is no one-size-fits-all rule.

Just leaving this note, it might be useful.

SSelin B***MemberCommunity member
Joined
Jun 2024
Message
33
#15

Thanks, this was very helpful. Most incidents start with a leaked password, not a vulnerability.

This is my opinion, I'm not claiming it's absolute truth.

EEsinMember
Job title
Career counselor
Joined
Jun 2024
Message
94

Doki · Interface design · 2026

#16

Generally correct, but one part is missing. The biggest time-waster for us was not knowing who had the final say.

Everyone rushing into penetration testing report gets stuck at the same point.

MMurat T***Member
Job title
Network Administrator
Sector
Insurance
Organization type
boutique agency
Joined
Jan 2025
Message
80
#17

Correct in theory, but it doesn't work that way in practice. Your time to detect an issue directly determines its cost.

Of course it varies if your situation is different.

FFerhat A***Member
Job title
Board member
Sector
Advertising and promotion
Organization type
20-person company
Joined
Jun 2024
Message
155
#18

I agree.

AAycan D***MemberCommunity member
Joined
Jul 2023
Message
10
#19

My perspective changed after experiencing that. If you scold false alarms, nobody will report again.

EErcan Ç***MemberCommunity member
Joined
Jun 2024
Message
62
#20

I was thinking the same thing. An automated scan report is not the same as a penetration test.

Reply